Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | oriol homs | 10-4 | None |
Izzet Prowess | konrad sokołowski | 9-5 | None |
Izzet Prowess | misplacedginger | 7-2 | None |
Izzet Prowess | slaxx | 6-2 | None |
Izzet Prowess | takuya yoshimura | 6-2 | None |
Izzet Prowess | yusuke nakamura | 6-2 | None |
Izzet Prowess | bartosz regent | 6-2 | None |
Temporal Trespass ranks #5040 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 98%).
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Temporal Trespass is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 0.74 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 11 mana, the average win rate in the format is 45.4%. Temporal Trespass has a win rate of 55.2%, making it 21.6% better than other 11-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proft's Eidetic Memory | Legendary Enchantment | 11 | 58.9% | 1 |
Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 5 | 57.8% | 0 |
Jwari Disruption | Instant | 6 | 57.3% | 0 |
Prismari Command | Instant | 12 | 53.0% | 0 |
Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 32 | 52.1% | 4 |
Rending Volley | Instant | 9 | 51.7% | 1 |
Picklock Prankster | Creature — Faerie Rogue // Instant — Adventure | 38 | 51.1% | 3 |
Negate | Instant | 39 | 51.1% | 4 |
Spikefield Hazard | Instant | 24 | 50.6% | 2 |
Sleight of Hand | Sorcery | 39 | 50.5% | 3 |
Cards that perform better with Temporal Trespass than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proft's Eidetic Memory | Legendary Enchantment | 2 | 9 | 67.4% | 57.7% | +9.7% |
Fable of the Mirror-Breaker | Enchantment — Saga | 3 | 9 | 60.0% | 55.3% | +4.7% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 35 | 58.5% | 55.8% | +2.6% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 35 | 58.1% | 56.0% | +2.0% |
Rending Volley | Instant | 1 | 9 | 59.1% | 57.1% | +2.0% |
Picklock Prankster | Creature — Faerie Rogue // Instant — Adventure | 2 | 35 | 57.3% | 55.7% | +1.6% |
Sleight of Hand | Sorcery | 1 | 36 | 56.1% | 54.6% | +1.4% |
Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 3 | 32 | 57.6% | 56.4% | +1.2% |
Jwari Disruption | Instant | 2 | 5 | 58.3% | 57.7% | +0.6% |
Crackling Drake | Creature — Drake | 4 | 45 | 55.2% | 55.1% | +0.1% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | 56 | 5.7% | 45.9% |
Dimir Bounce | 2 | 0.4% | 71.4% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.